Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Hiland Dairy

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 23, 2000No. CA 99-740PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andree Layton Roaf, Judge.

Michael Cooper appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission, which denied his claim for benefits. The Commission found that Cooper failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he sustained a compensable injury. On appeal, Cooper argues that: (1) there is not substantial evidence to support the Commission’s decision; and (2) the Commission’s reversal of the Administrative Law Judge, who saw and heard the witnesses, based on credibility of the witnesses constitutes the denial of due process and fundamental fairness under the United States and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Fort Smith v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Johnson v. HuxCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Tyson Foods, Inc. v. DisheroonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Boyd v. General IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Continental Express v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hapney v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Roberts v. WhirlpoolCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Liaromatis v. Baxter County Regional HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Coleman v. Pro Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Stiger v. State Line Tire ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API