Legal Opinion

Ray v. University of Arkansas

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 28, 1999No. CA 98-1215PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wendell L. Griffen, Judge.

Gudrun Ray appeals the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s determination that her injury is not compensable, arguing that the decision is not supported by substantial evidence. The Commission found that Ray was not performing employment services at the time of her injury. We reverse and remand for an award of benefits.

Ray has worked for the University of Arkansas as a food-service worker for approximately eight years. Working in the cafeteria at the University of Arkansas, appellant was entitled to two unpaid thirty-minute breaks and two paid fifteen-minute breaks…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. PetteySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. City of Fort Smith v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Wade v. Mr. C. Cavenaugh'sSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. McMillan v. U.S. MotorsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Johnson v. HuxCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. White v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Wallace v. West Fraser South, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Texarkana School District v. ConnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Moncus v. Billingsley Logging & American Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Arkansas Methodist Hospital v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API