Reeck v. Mendoza
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OLSON, Judge.*
¶ 1 This family court ease requires us to examine whether a final award of attorneys’ fees is a prerequisite to appellate jurisdiction over a decision that resolves the merits of a petition for child support. A recent opinion by a different panel of this court held that a family court decision does not become final for purposes of appeal until the issue of attorneys’ fees has been resolved. See Ghadimi v. Soraya, 230 Ariz. 621, 623-24, ¶¶ 13-15, 285 P.3d 969, 971-72 (App.2012).1 We reach the opposite conclusion with respect to the order at issue here.2
¶ 2 Appellant Brian…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Barassi v. MatisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Davis v. Cessna Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Craig v. CraigArizona Supreme Court · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re the Marriage Of: Bollermann v. NowlisArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Lopez v. Food CityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Alvares v. MunguiaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Engstrom v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Kaestle v. KaestleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.