Legal Opinion

Reeck v. Mendoza

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 27, 2013No. 1 CA-CV 12-0158PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OLSON, Judge.*

¶ 1 This family court ease requires us to examine whether a final award of attorneys’ fees is a prerequisite to appellate jurisdiction over a decision that resolves the merits of a petition for child support. A recent opinion by a different panel of this court held that a family court decision does not become final for purposes of appeal until the issue of attorneys’ fees has been resolved. See Ghadimi v. Soraya, 230 Ariz. 621, 623-24, ¶¶ 13-15, 285 P.3d 969, 971-72 (App.2012).1 We reach the opposite conclusion with respect to the order at issue here.2

¶ 2 Appellant Brian…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  2. Barassi v. MatisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Davis v. Cessna Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Craig v. CraigArizona Supreme Court · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage Of: Bollermann v. NowlisArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Lopez v. Food CityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Alvares v. MunguiaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  4. Engstrom v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. Kaestle v. KaestleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API