In Re the Marriage Of: Bollermann v. Nowlis
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Vice Chief Justice BALES,
opinion of the Court.
¶ 1 We granted review to determine whether a party may appeal a family court order that neither resolves a pending request for attorneys’ fees nor includes language making the order appealable pursuant to Arizona Rule of Family Law Procedure 78(B). Because we interpret Rule 78(B) consistently with its civil counterpart, Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), we hold that such an order is not final for purposes of appeal.
I
¶ 2 Karen Lynn Bollermann (“Wife”) and Stephen Michael Nowlis (“Husband”) divorced in 2006. Beginning in the fall of 2009 they…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew PayneArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Craig v. CraigArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- National Broker Associates, Inc. v. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Ghadimi v. SorayaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- In re the Marriage of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Danko v. DankoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Frederick v. BarreiraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Larrea v. ChandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025
- Palanti v. PalantiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.