Lopez v. Food City
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant Manuel Lopez appeals from the trial court’s decision granting a motion for judgment as a matter of law in favor of appellee Food City. Because we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal as untimely.
¶ 2 Although Food City has not directly challenged the jurisdiction of this court, it has suggested that jurisdiction may be lacking, and “[t]his court has an independent duty to determine whether it has jurisdiction to consider an appeal.” Reeck v. Mendoza, 232 Ariz. 299, ¶ 3, 304 P.3d 1122, 1123 (App.2013). In general, a notice of appeal filed before a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barassi v. MatisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Craig v. CraigArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re the Marriage of GrayArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Drozda v. McComasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Camasura v. CamasuraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015