Legal Opinion

Lopez v. Food City

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 25, 2014No. 2 CA-CV 2013-0105PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Manuel Lopez appeals from the trial court’s decision granting a motion for judgment as a matter of law in favor of appellee Food City. Because we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal as untimely.

¶ 2 Although Food City has not directly challenged the jurisdiction of this court, it has suggested that jurisdiction may be lacking, and “[t]his court has an independent duty to determine whether it has jurisdiction to consider an appeal.” Reeck v. Mendoza, 232 Ariz. 299, ¶ 3, 304 P.3d 1122, 1123 (App.2013). In general, a notice of appeal filed before a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barassi v. MatisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Craig v. CraigArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In Re the Marriage of GrayArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Drozda v. McComasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Camasura v. CamasuraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API