Legal Opinion

Broadbent v. Broadbent

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1995No. CV-93-0378-PRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORCORAN, Justice.

We must determine whether the doctrine of parental immunity bars Christopher Broadbent’s action against his mother for negligence. We also discuss the viability of the line of Arizona cases creating and refining the parental immunity doctrine. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article 6, § 5(3) of the Arizona Constitution, and rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

I. Facts

Christopher and his mother, Laura J. Broadbent, went swimming at the family residence on April 13, 1984, their first day of *75swimming that year. Christopher…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Holodook v. SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Cates v. CatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Gibson v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lewis Ex Rel. Lewis v. West American Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Johnson v. PankratzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. Zellmer v. ZellmerWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Zellmer v. ZellmerWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Fields v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API