Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Pankratz

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 4, 2000No. 1 CA-CV 99-0431PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Judge.

¶ 1 Christa Johnson appeals from the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict against her on her battery and negligence claims. The primary issue is whether Johnson’s failure to prove damages in a specific amount for nonphysical harm caused by sexual abuse justified the trial court’s grant of a directed ver- diet against her on her claims for battery and punitive damages. We conclude that Johnson is entitled to compensatory damages for non-physical injury arising from the battery of sexual abuse, without specific proof of a dollar amount. We reverse the trial court’s grant…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Linthicum v. Nationwide Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Laurie Marie M. v. Jeffrey T. M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Valley National Bank v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bell v. Maricopa Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Craig v. M & O AGENCIES, INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Susan Ryan v. napier/kleinArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Wichansky v. ZowineDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
  5. Chappell v. WenholzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API