Johnson v. Pankratz
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOCI, Judge.
¶ 1 Christa Johnson appeals from the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict against her on her battery and negligence claims. The primary issue is whether Johnson’s failure to prove damages in a specific amount for nonphysical harm caused by sexual abuse justified the trial court’s grant of a directed ver- diet against her on her claims for battery and punitive damages. We conclude that Johnson is entitled to compensatory damages for non-physical injury arising from the battery of sexual abuse, without specific proof of a dollar amount. We reverse the trial court’s grant…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Linthicum v. Nationwide Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Laurie Marie M. v. Jeffrey T. M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Valley National Bank v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- Bell v. Maricopa Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Craig v. M & O AGENCIES, INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Susan Ryan v. napier/kleinArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Wichansky v. ZowineDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
- Chappell v. WenholzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.