Legal Opinion

Zellmer v. Zellmer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2008No. 78852-9PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

¶1 Three-year-old Ashley McLellan drowned in a backyard swimming pool while under the supervision of her stepfather, Joel Zellmer. The trial court ruled the parental immunity doctrine shields Zellmer from liability for negligence in connection with her death. Petitioners Stacey Ferguson1 and Bruce McLellan, Ashley’s biological parents, challenge that ruling. They contend the parental immunity doctrine should be abolished in favor of a reasonable parent standard. Alternatively, they argue the doctrine does not apply under the facts of this case.

¶2 We reaffirm that the doctrine of parental…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ducote v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Larry Riley v. Iron Gate Self StorageCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  3. Porter v. KirkendollWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Greenwood v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Rodriguez v. City of Moses LakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API