Legal Opinion
Tarullo v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 20, 2003No. SC 16797PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The plaintiff, Vincent J. Tarullo, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the granting of a wetlands and watercourses permit in connection with a proposed residential subdivision in the town of Wolcott. He contends that the trial court improperly affirmed the decision of the named defendant, the inland wetlands and watercourses commission of the town of Wolcott (commission), because: (1) the commission failed properly to consider alternatives that would cause less or no environmental impact to the wetlands and watercourses, as required…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Murach v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Gagnon v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Smith v. SnyderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- River Bend Associates, Inc. v. Conservation & Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Brunswick v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- United Jewish Center v. Town of BrookfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.