Legal Opinion

Meacham v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1907No. 6400PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Yakey, J., entered February 8, 1906, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to quiet title.

1Per curiam

This action was brought by respondents to quiet title to a certain parcel of land in the city of Seattle, which the city claims as a .street. A decree was entered substantially as prayed for, and the city appeals.

The facts are as follows: In the year 1869, Edward Han-ford laid off a tract of land in King county into streets, alleys, lots and blocks, and designated the same “Hanford’s Addition to South Seattle.” A plat ivas made showing blocks numbered from 1 to 10, inclusive. Each block was *382divided by an alley, and the lots numbered in each block. Streets were shown running north and south,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Corsicana v. ZornTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Matthiessen & Hegeler Zinc Co. v. City of La SalleIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Reid v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  4. City of Seattle v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Hagaman v. DittmarSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Freeman v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Frye v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Tissino v. MavrakisWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Osborne v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. City of Spokane v. Security Savings SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API