Legal Opinion
Frye v. King County
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 11, 1929No. 21421. Department TwoPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.
For many years prior to 1900, one Edgar Battle and one Claude C. Ramsey were, the owners of Lots 1 and 2, of Section 34, Township 26 North, Range 4 East W. M., King county, Washington. This land bordered on Lake Washington, and on the 17th day of October, 1903, Mr. Battle and Mr. Ramsey, as upland owners, made application to purchase the second class shore lands lying in front of Lots 1 and 2, and a contract was issued to them whereby the state of Washington agreed to sell such shore lands, the payments to be made in installments. The contract provided for forfeiture in case of default.
Thereaf…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashford v. ReeseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Melin v. Community Consolidated School District No. 76Illinois Supreme Court · 1924
- City of Palmetto v. KatschSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
- Ramstad v. CarrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- East Birmingham Realty Co. v. Birmingham Machine & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Atlantic City Transportation Co. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Newport Yacht Basin Ass'n of Condominium Owners v. Supreme Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Roeder Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Cady v. KerrWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Kiely v. GravesWashington Supreme Court · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.