Legal Opinion
HP Inc. v. MPHJ Technology Investment., LLC
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 5, 2016No. 2015-1427PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
HP Inc. (“HP”) appeals from the final decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) in an inter partes review (“IPR”) proceeding finding claims 1-12, 14, and 15 of U.S. Patent 6,771,381 (the “'381 patent”), owned by MPHJ Technology Investments (“MPHJ”), unpatentable as anticipated, and finding claim 13 of the '38Í patent not unpatentable as anticipated. See Hewlett-Packard Co. v. MPHJ Tech. Invs., LLC, IPR2013-00309, 2014 WL 6617698 (P.T.A.B. Nov. 19, 2014) (“Final Decision ”). HP argues that the Board erred…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family PhysiciansSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Shaw Industries Group, Inc. v. Automated Creel Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Westlake ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Sionyx, LLC v. Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp. v. Snap-On Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2017
- Palomar Techs., Inc. v. Mrsi Sys., LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Agarwal v. Topgolf International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.