Legal Opinion
Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Westlake Services
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 9, 2017No. 2016-2001PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge MAYER.
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Credit Acceptance Corp. (“CAC”) appeals the final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) in a Covered Business Method (“CBM”) review proceeding. The Board determined that claims 10-12 and 14-33 of CAC’s U.S. Patent No. 6,950,807 B2 (“the ’807 patent”) are directed to patent-ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. CAC appeals the Board’s determination that the *1047petitioner, Westlake Services, LLC (“Westlake”), was not estopped from maintaining CBM review of those claims under 35 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Electric Power Group, LLC v. Alstom S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- SAP Am., Inc. v. InvestPic, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- IBM v. Zillow Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Trading Techs. Int'l, Inc. v. Ibg LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Weisner v. Google LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.