Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family Physicians

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 9, 1986No. 85-225PublishedCited by 944 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

The question presented in this case is whether Congress, in either § 1395ff or § 1395ii of Title 42 of the United States Code, barred judicial review of regulations promulgated under Part B of the Medicare program.

Respondents, who include an association of family physicians and several individual doctors, filed suit to challenge the validity of 42 CFR § 405.504(b) (1985), which authorizes the payment of benefits in different amounts for similar physicians’ services. The District Court held that the regulation contravened several provisions of the statute governing the Medicare program:

“There…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  4. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by944 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Schweiker v. ChilickySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Webster v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Reno v. Catholic Social Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

939 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API