Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. v. Gulian
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STARK, U.S. District Judge:
Pending before the Court is Defendants David T. Gulian, John A. Roberts, Eric N. Rubino, Manuel A. Henriquez, Mark S. Denomme, and Roy Y. Liu’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.’s (“Stanley” or “Black & Decker” or “Plaintiff’) Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). (D.I. 16) For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant in part *725and deny in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff filed this action against Defendants on October 8, 2012, alleging securities…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Focus Financial Partners, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025