Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 30, 1958No. 522PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Winborne, C. J.:

Plaintiff appellant challenges the judgment from which appeal is taken upon the grounds that the trial judge erred, first in failing to make finding of fact in respect to his, plaintiff’s, inability to pay more than he has paid, and second, in ordering imprisonment of plaintiff as specified.

The first point on which the challenge is made, as above stated, is, in the light of established principles set forth in decisions of this Court, *300well taken. See Yow v. Yow, 243 N.C. 79, 89 S.E. 2d 867, in which in opinion by Parker, J., it is said: “The lower court has not found as a fact…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lamm v. . LammSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Yow v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Cromartie v. Commissioners of BladenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. West v. . WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Dyer v. . DyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McMiller v. McMillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Ray v. GreerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. Gorrell v. GorrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Cox v. CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Cox v. CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API