Legal Opinion

Dyer v. . Dyer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 25, 1938PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant petitioned in the pending cause asking for a modification of the original order granting alimony and for his discharge because of his inability to pay it.

The defendant is bound by the facts adversely found by the court below upon competent evidence, and is not entitled to relief in this Court. Lodge v. Gibbs, 159 N. C., 66, 69; Bank v. Chamblee, 188 N. C., 417, 124 S. E., 748. His contention that the court was without power to make an order, the effect of which might be to confine him in jail for more than thirty days, is without merit. Green v. Green, 130 N. C., 578, 41 S. E.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cromartie v. Commissioners of BladenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Green v. Green.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  3. Bank of Zebulon v. ChambleeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Mocksville Lodge, No. 134 v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mauney v. MauneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. United Artists Records, Inc. v. Eastern Tape Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Edmundson v. EdmundsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Blue Jeans Corp. v. AMALGAMATED CLOTH. WKRS. OF AM.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Edmundson v. . EdmundsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API