Cox v. Cox
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Concurrence
Judge Brock
concurring.
I concur in the holding of the majority opinion that the judgment of indefinite confinement in this case is not supported by a finding that the husband presently possesses the means to comply. Obviously the husband’s financial condition will not be enhanced by confining him to jail; and, absent a present capa*479bility to comply, the indefinite confinement order is self-defeating. I am aware that there are instances where the “clanging of the jail door” will suddenly sharpen the memory of a recalcitrant husband so that he will pursue a financial resource that had “slipped…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mauney v. MauneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Dyer v. . DyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Basnight v. BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955