Legal Opinion

Cromartie v. Commissioners of Bladen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1881PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Rule upon the defendant commissioners to show cause why they should not be attached for contempt, heard at Spring Term, 1881, of BladeN Superior Court, before Gudgerr, J. The defendants appealed from the ruling below.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The plaintiff having sued, an d at spring term, 1875, recovered judgment against the board of county commissioners of Bladen for the sum of $4,760, with interest thereon from February 5th preceding, to enforce the pay ment thereof applied for and obtained a writ of mandamus commanding the commissioners, as soon as permitted by law, to levy and collect a sufficient tax to discharge the debt. The process isscted on December 25th, 1879, and was returnable and returned to spring term following. To this mandate the commissioners answered that they were only authorized by law, with a concurrence of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pain v. . PainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. Johnston v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  3. J. N. Clegg v. . the New York White Soap Stone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  4. In Re WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. In Re DavesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. Frew & HartWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Ex parte CreasySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  3. In Re DeatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Ex Parte DuncanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
  5. Manufacturing Co. v. . ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API