Legal Opinion
Wisness v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 18, 2011No. 20100401PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Chase Wisness (“Wisness”) appeals the district court summary judgment in favor of Nodak Mutual Insurance Company (“Nodak”) finding the Farm and Ranch Excess Liability Policy did not provide coverage for his claim. Wisness argues the district court erred by finding the insurance policy did not provide underin-sured motorist coverage. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] On June 1, 2007, Wisness was a passenger in a vehicle driven by an unrelated third party. An accident occurred, and Wisness was injured and is now a paraplegic. At the time of the accident, Milo Wisness, Wisness’s father,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- STANFORD RANCH, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Northwest G.F. Mutual Insurance Co. v. NorgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. University of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Fisher v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Aid Insurance Services, Inc. v. GeigerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- K & L Homes, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Tibert v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Forsman v. Blues Brews and Bar-B-Ques Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Borsheim Builders Supply, Inc. v. Manger Insurance, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Vanguard Insurance v. McKinneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.