Legal Opinion

Tibert v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 2012No. 20110143PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Mark Tibert, Melvin Tibert, Sue Tibert, and William Tibert (“Tiberts”) appeal from a district court summary judgment dismissing their declaratory judgment action against Nodak Mutual Insurance Company (“Nodak”). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings, concluding the district court did not err in concluding Nodak had no duty to indemnify the Ti-berts for damages they were ordered to pay in an underlying lawsuit but did err in concluding Nodak had no duty to defend the Tiberts in the lawsuit.

I

[¶ 2] Mark, Melvin, and William Tibert are…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Barbara B.California Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Cadwallader v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Rowell v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  5. Continental Western Insurance v. ToalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. K & L Homes, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Forsman v. Blues Brews and Bar-B-Ques Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Borsheim Builders Supply, Inc. v. Manger Insurance, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Desert Partners IV, L.P. v. BensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Hiland Partners GP Holdings, LLC v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API