Legal Opinion
STANFORD RANCH, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 15, 1996No. 95-15549PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Stanford Ranch, Inc., (“Stanford”) brought suit against Maryland Casualty Company and Northern Insurance Company of New York 1 (collectively “Maryland”) claiming breach of insurance contracts and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The parties cross-moved for summary judgment, and the district court granted the motion in favor of Maryland and denied the motion of Stanford. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A. The Underlying Lawsuits
Stanford is a developer of a master-planned…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Bernard Picot v. Dean WestonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Los Angeles Lakers, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Chester-O'Donley & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Vestar Development Ii, Llc, an Arizona Limited Liability v. General Dynamics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Clinton v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.