Legal Opinion

Northwest G.F. Mutual Insurance Co. v. Norgard

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1994No. Civ. 930354PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

Northwest G.F. Mutual Insurance Company (Northwest) appealed from a summary judgment in favor of defendants Ronald and Kimberly Anderson (pseudonyms) and Jean Norgard, requiring Northwest to defend and indemnify Jean Norgard in an underlying tort action. We reverse.

Jean Norgard operated a home day care business at the Norgard residence in Cassel-ton, North Dakota. Jean and her husband Ray purchased homeowners insurance from Northwest. Ray is the named insured on the policy, and all relatives residing in the Nor-gard household are also insureds. The policy provides,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chacon v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Catholic Diocese of Dodge City v. RaymerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. Worcester Mutual Insurance v. MarnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. KinseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Aid Insurance Services, Inc. v. GeigerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. BP America, Inc. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. Hanneman v. Continental Western Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Companies v. LagodinskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. California Casualty Insurance v. Northland InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API