Legal Opinion

Metro Properties, Inc. v. Yatsko

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 18, 2000No. 99-353-AppealPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This appeal concerns an alleged breach of an oral agreement among real-estate brokers to share a commission on the sale of real estate. It also addresses the propriety of an attorney’s fee award in connection with a failed attempt to arbitrate this dispute. The plaintiff, real-estate broker Metro Properties, Inc. (Metro), appeals from a Superior Court summary judgment in favor of the defendants, real-estate agents Edward Yatsko and Arthur Yatsko d/b/a Salisbury Agency (Salisbury). Metro contends that the motion justice erred because issues of material fact existed that precluded the…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Textron, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  2. Travers v. SpidellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  3. Buonanno v. Colmar Belting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  4. Leimbach v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  5. Melbourne v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mutual Development Corp. v. Ward Fisher & Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  2. Brochu v. SantisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  3. Coldwell Banker Manning Realty, Inc. v. Cushman & WakefieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. Coldwell Banker Manning Realty, Inc. v. Cushman & WakefieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. Coldwell Banker Manning Realty, Inc. v. Cushman & WakefieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API