Legal Opinion

Travers v. Spidell

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided September 13, 1996No. 95-527-AppealPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This appeal requires us to determine whether a general merger-and-disclaimer clause in a real estate purchase-and-sale agreement (P & S) bars a fraud claim based on the sellers’ alleged misrepresentations concerning tiie presence of a well on the property. A Superior Court justice entered judgment in favor of the selling defendants, Edward T. and Christine Spidell (the Spi-dells), after he granted a summary-judgment motion filed by them. Counsel for the parties came before us after we issued an order to the plaintiff, Richard M. Travers, to show cause why this appeal should not be…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marr Scaffolding Co., Inc. v. Fairground Forms, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  2. Halpert v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  3. Cliftex Clothing Co. v. Di SantoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1959
  4. LaFazia v. HoweSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  5. Hunt v. BarkerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by33 opinions

  1. Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Women's Development Corp. v. City of Central FallsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  3. Guilbeault v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2000
  4. Bogosian v. BedermanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  5. Ed Peters Jewelry Co. v. C & J Jewelry Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API