Legal Opinion
Melbourne v. Griffith
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 15, 1971No. [No. 69, September Term, 1971.]PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Appellee, M. W. Griffith (Griffith), a real estate broker, believes appellant, P. G. Melbourne (Melbourne), another broker, is indebted to him for a portion of the commissions on the sale of some Prince George’s County real estate. He convinced a jury of that fact and recovered judgment. We shall here reverse that judgment.
Melbourne filed a motion for summary judgment which was decided adversely to him by a judge other than the judge who sat at the trial of the case. He points out that under Maryland Rule 887 on an appeal from a final judgment “every interlocutory order which has previously…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Leimbach v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Fishman Construction Co. v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Bowie v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
- Burrell v. FrisbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
3Cited by20 opinions
- Salisbury Beauty Schools v. State Board of CosmetologistsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Lynx, Inc. v. Ordnance Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Board of Trustees v. John K. Ruff, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Richard F. Kline, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Metropolitan Mortgage Fund, Inc. v. BasilikoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.