Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Wilson

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On motion to dismiss the bill, under Rule 224.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

This is an amicable proceeding between the complainant and her six children to determine their respective rights in a farm in Monmouth county.

The complainant is the daughter of Austin Anderson, who died in April, 1843, leaving a will which bears date on the 25th day of March, 1843, and which was proved before the surrogate of Monmouth county in May of the same year. The parts of the will which bear upon the questions presented are as follows :

“All the remainder and residue of my estate, both real and personal, whatsoever and wheresoever the same may be situate, after paying my…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wills v. KaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gaston v. FordNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  2. Briggs v. FaulknerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  3. West Side Trust Co. v. GiulianoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  4. De Wolf v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1893
  5. Trafton v. BainbridgeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API