Legal Opinion

De Wolf v. Middleton

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 28, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Bill in Equity for partition.

1Opinion of the Court

This is a bill for partition. By agreement of the parties a hearing was had for the purpose of obtaining a construction of the second and fifth clauses of the will of William De Wolf, formerly of Bristol, deceased; the question involved being, what estates did the daughters of the testator take under these clauses in the lands therein described.

The second clause, after devising the testator's farm known as the Poppasquash Farm to his widow for life, proceeds as follows: "after her decease I do give and devise the same real estate to my two dear daughters, Charlotte and Maria, their heirs and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re KenyonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1890
  2. In Re SwinburneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1888
  3. Pinkham v. BlairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1876
  4. Hall v. ChaffeeSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1843
  5. Wilson v. WilsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sagers v. SagersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Prince v. BarhamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  3. Bank of Delaware v. HitchensCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1961
  4. RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL TRUST COMPANY v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API