Legal Opinion
Stohlts v. Gilkinson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 1, 2005No. AC 24618PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The defendants, James F. Gilkinson, individually and as trustee of the Gilkinson Family Trust, and Robert Dickinson, appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the plaintiffs, Harold Stohlts and Robin Stohlts. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly (1) found title of a certain parcel of land in favor of the plaintiffs, (2) found that the general public has a right to use Old Turnpike Road, (3) found the defendants liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress and awarded damages for that tort,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Carrol v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Tedesco v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Tedesco v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Markey v. SantangeloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Craig Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Viacom Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Chioffi v. MartinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Fernandes v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Day v. GabrieleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- R. F. Daddario & Sons, Inc. v. ShelanskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.