Legal Opinion

Cruz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 9, 2000No. Docket 206120PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

On October 26, 1994, plaintiff was involved in an automobile accident. Plaintiff alleges that he was seriously injured when an uninsured motorist negligently struck his automobile. At the time of the accident, plaintiff was insured by defendant. Plaintiff’s policy included uninsured motorist coverage and the statutorily mandated first-party coverage. The policy also includes the following examination under oath (euo)…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Auto-Owners Insurance v. ChurchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Rohlman v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cruz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Sprague v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Wineholt v. Cincinnati InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
  4. Yaldo v. ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CAS. INS. CO.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  5. American Home Assurance Co. v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API