Wineholt v. Cincinnati Insurance
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Daniel Wineholt (“Wineholt”), has sued Defendant, Cincinnati Insurance Company (“CIC”), alleging that CIC breached the terms of an insurance policy by failing to pay Wineholt for a loss covered by the policy. Wineholt initially filed this case in Kent. County Circuit Court. On January 29, 2001, CIC removed the case to this Court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. Now before the Court is CIC’s motion for summary judgment.
Facts
Wineholt is in the equipment leasing business. Prior to 1999, Wineholt entered into leasing contracts with a company known as…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. ChurchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Upjohn Co. v. New Hampshire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Agristor Financial Corp. v. Van SickleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shathaia v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
- Bowlers' Alley, Inc. v. Cincinnati InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Samuels v. Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- Infinity Roofing & Siding, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2023
- Karoumi v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.