Legal Opinion

State v. Muliufi

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1982No. 8088PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The State of Hawaii (hereinafter State), appeals from an order entered in by the District Court of the First Circuit which dismissed a criminal charge brought against Isaako Muliufi, defendant-appellee (hereinafter appellee), for violating HRS § 134-51, carrying a deadly weapon. The issue presented for our consideration, which was not decided in State v. Bonds, 59 Haw. 130, 577 P.2d 781 (1978), is whether nunchaku sticks are a deadly or dangerous weapon within the meaning of HRS § 134-51. We hold that nunchaku sticks are not per se deadly or dangerous weapons and therefore affirm the decision…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. OgataHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. GiltnerHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. RackleHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. State v. KahalewaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MedeirosHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. In re S.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. VanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Maloney v. SingasDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  5. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API