Legal Opinion

State v. Rackle

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1974No. 5501PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

MENOR, J.

Defendant Lee Rackle was tried in district court on May 3, 1973, and found guilty of violating HRS § 727-25 (now HRS § 134-51), which prohibits the carrying of a deadly weapon. At the time of his arrest the defendant had in his possession a distress flare, commonly referred to as a “flare gun”, which then contained a phosphorus cartridge. The trial court found that this distress flare was “a deadly weapon if used in an offensive manner.” In denying the defendant’s motion for reconsideration, the court stated that it found the flare gun to be a per se deadly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Germaine M. Haili v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  2. Village of Barboursville Ex Rel. Bates v. TaylorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Beeler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Coray v. AriyoshiHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. OgataHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re Wallace W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. State v. SmithHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. LawrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. SampsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API