Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Doe

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 1994No. 15931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

ACOBA, J.

While the Defendant Minor (hereinafter Defendant) was changing a tire on his truck, he was arrested by the police for a curfew violation. The police subsequently seized a wooden implement from his truck and charged *405Defendant with carrying a “billy” in a vehicle, in violation of Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 134-51 (Supp. 1991).1 Defendant appealed from the family court’s February 10, 1992 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order denying Defendant’s motion to suppress the seizure of the implement and Defendant’s motion to reconsider which had attacked…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. OgataHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. GiltnerHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. RackleHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. FerraroHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. M.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API