Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Adams

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1976No. 1471PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Judge:

This appeal requires our interpretation of the section of the new Crimes Code prohibiting the possession of offensive weapons.1 We hold that the appellant in this case, who was in possession of a set of nunchaku sticks, was not in violation of that statute.

The nunchaku is an implement used in the martial arts and was originally developed in Southeast Asia. Its form recalls a small agricultural flail: two sticks of wood, about a foot long, hinged end to end by a short cord so as to allow freedom of swivel. The karate student by holding one of the sticks can swing or twirl the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PondsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. GattoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. McNearSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. SattazahnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. In re S.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API