Legal Opinion

In Re Ogea

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 2004No. G033402PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FYBEL, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

A jury convicted Kenneth Robert Ogea of one count of unlawfully possessing methamphetamine in his home while armed with a firearm (Health & Saf. Code, § 11370.1, subd. (a)). By petition for writ of habeas corpus, Ogea challenges the trial court’s order denying his request for probation and treatment under Proposition 36, the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000 (Pen. Code, §§ 1210, 1210.1, 3063.1), and for release on his own recognizance.

Ogea’s writ petition presents an issue of first impression: Whether his conviction under Health and Safety Code…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. AveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Curle v. Superior Court of Shasta CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Juarez v. Arcadia Financial, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Faulder v. Mendocino County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. People v. KirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. People v. MonizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. People v. ForemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API