Archibald v. Kemble
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
CLELAND, J.:
¶ 1 Appellants, Robert and Krista Archibald (Archibald or Archibalds), appeal the December 6, 2007 Order granting Appellee Cody Kemble’s (Kemble) Motion for Summary Judgment. The crux of this case is the standard of care to be applied when a player in an adult “no-check” ice hockey league checks and injures another player in violation of the league rules. Because we conclude the applicable standard of care is recklessness and because the Ar-chibalds were not required to specifically plead recklessness in their Complaint and because they produced evidence of recklessness…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jaworski v. KiernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Nabozny v. BarnhillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Ammlung v. PlattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Dale Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., and Charles "Booby" ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Ross v. ClouserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- M.U. ex rel. Urban v. Downingtown High School EastDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Dorley v. South Fayette Township School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Monroe, A. v. CBH20, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Zeidman v. FisherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Simpson v. Phila. Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.