Legal Opinion
Jaworski v. Kiernan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 17, 1997No. SC 15562PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALLAHAN, C. J.
The sole issue in this appeal is what duty of care the defendant, Harry Kieman, owed the plaintiff, Cynthia A. Jaworski, while both were participating on opposing teams in an adult coed soccer game sponsored by the recreation department of the town of South Windsor. We conclude that the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care to refrain from reckless or intentional conduct. Because the jury determined that the defendant’s conduct, which caused the plaintiff’s injuries, was negligent only, and not reckless or intentional, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Turcotte v. FellNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Shore v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Thompson v. McNeillOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Marchetti v. KalishOhio Supreme Court · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Perodeau v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Southwest Key Program, Inc. v. Gil-PerezTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Pfenning v. LinemanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Ritchie-Gamester v. City of BerkleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.