Legal Opinion

Ross v. Clouser

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 23, 1982No. 63248PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENDLEN, Judge.

This is a damage suit for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff was knocked down during play in a softball game.1 The trial court set aside the plaintiff’s verdict, finding that plaintiff had assumed the risk of the collision and his only action lay for an intentional tort. The Court of Appeals, Eastern District, affirming, noted the Southern District’s decision in Niemczyk v. Burleson, 538 S.W.2d 737 (Mo.App.1976), which held that a player injured in an athletic contest may recover for a fellow participant’s negligence, but nonetheless concluded that recovery in athletic…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nabozny v. BarnhillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. Bourque v. DuplechinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Gregory v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. Niemczyk v. BurlesonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Turpin v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Marchetti v. KalishOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Southwest Key Program, Inc. v. Gil-PerezTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Pfenning v. LinemanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Ritchie-Gamester v. City of BerkleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API