Legal Opinion

Zeidman v. Fisher

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 13, 2009No. 3309 EDA 2008PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

CLELAND, J.:

¶ 1 This case reminds us again of the utility of communication to prevent injury, even in the pastoral setting of a golf course and in the context of a game in which etiquette is as integral as skill.

¶ 2 Appellant Stuart Zeidman (Zeidman) appeals the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee Troy Fisher.

¶ 3 On October 16, 2008, following the completion of pleadings and discovery, the trial court granted Troy Fisher’s motion for summary judgment and, on November 6, 2008, denied Zeidman’s motion for reconsideration.12 Because we conclude genuine…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Carrender v. FittererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Jones v. Three Rivers Management Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Thompson v. GinkelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Gross v. Stryker Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Dorley v. South Fayette Township School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Matharu v. MuirSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Hawkins v. Switchback MX, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API