Crawford v. Hemmingway
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, C.
There are several assignments of error in the petition in error, but in the presentation and argument of the case in defendant’s brief only one proposition is stated and argued, which is that the tidal court committed reversible error in withdrawing the case from the consideration of the jury and in entering a decree in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant.
The first contention made under this proposition is that the case was properly triable to the jury, and that the court erred in seis-taining the motion of the plaintiff to withdraw the case from the jury.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Maas v. DunmyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Echols v. ReeburghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Moore v. StantonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Hartsog v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Butler Bros. Development Co. v. ButlerMontana Supreme Court · 1941
- Irwin v. SandsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Jones v. BensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Atlas Life Ins. Co. v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Ballinger v. SarkeysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.