Legal Opinion

Maas v. Dunmyer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 23, 1908No. 2052, Okla. TPublishedCited by 40 opinions

Error from District Court, Payne County; John H. Burford, Judge. Action by Mary E. Dunmyer against John Maas, by his guardian, G. W. Longan, and others. Judgment for plaintiff:, and Maas, by his guardian, brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

On tbe 22 d day of Juty, 1902, John Maas, plaintiff in error, represented in this proceeding by his guardian, C. W. Longan, was the owner of the fee title to 160 acres of land in Payne county, Olda. On said date he conveyed said land by warranty deed to John J. Harsin, and said Iiarsin on same day by warranty deed conveyed said land to Nannie M. Rush. On August 1, 1902, Nannie M. Rush and her husband borrowed of the defendant in error, Mary E. Dunmyer, the sum of $1,200, executing therefor their certain promissory noté due in five years, with interest at 7%, per cent, per annum. To secure the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fish v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Swasey v. AdairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Gribben v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  4. Odom v. . RiddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  5. Ashcraft v. De ArmondSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Harn v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Adams Oil & Gas Co. v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Zahn v. ObertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API