Legal Opinion

Ballinger v. Sarkeys

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 14, 1961No. 38831PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, Justice.

This action was filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants, seeking to quiet title and as an incident thereto cancel a sheriff’s deed and court decree approving same, and oust the defendant S. J. Sarkeys from his title and possession to certain real property held by him by virtue of the sheriff’s deed.

From the judgment denying cancellation and refusing to oust defendant Sarkeys from possession, the plaintiffs have appealed.

The sole error alleged by plaintiffs is that the judgment is contrary to the evidence and contrary to law.

To sustain the burden of proof the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Burke v. Inter-State Savings & Loan Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. McDuffie v. Geiser Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Chivers v. Board of Com'rs of Johnston CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Burgess v. NailCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  5. Kalb v. German Savings & Loan SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Booth v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Conville v. BakkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  3. Skelly Oil Co. v. District Court of Pittsburg CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. Lebus v. CardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  5. Albertha Rudy McKee Agnes Rudy and John Wesley Rudy v. Evelyn Hassebroek, W. E. Hassebroek and Helen M. BullockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API