Legal Opinion

Hartsog v. Berry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 24, 1914No. 3435PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from District Court, Noble) 'County; Hon. W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by Henry J. Hartsog and others against O. B. Berry and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtLoofbourrow, J.

On November 17, 1908, O. B. Berry, as party of the first part, defendant in error, and Henry J. Hartsog and Clara Hartsog, parties of the second part, plaintiffs in error, entered into a written agreement whereby the first party was to convey, by warranty deed, certain lots in the city of Enid 'and the town of New Cordell, to the party of the second part, subject to a mortgage of $1,500, and the second parties were to convey to the first party 160 acres of land in Noble county, Olda., subject to a mortgage of $2,700, and the second parties were to- give a mortgage' to the first party in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Huston v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Angus v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Maas v. DunmyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Larkin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Success Realty Co. v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Holmes v. HalstidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Echols v. ReeburghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Renas v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API