Legal Opinion
Irwin v. Sands
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 22, 1953No. 35363PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM..
The parties to this appeal will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court: A. S. Sands was the plaintiff, Sylvia Rogers Irwin and Raymond C. Irwin, her husband, were defendants. Since Raymond C. Irwin was only a nominal defendant and all the controversy really only affected Sylvia Rogers Irwin, she will be referred to as defendant in the singular.
Plaintiff instituted this action to recover a money judgment on a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage on a portion of an Osage Indian headright, given by defendant to secure the indebtedness evidenced by the promissory…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hogan v. LeeperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Echols v. ReeburghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- First National Bank of Tulsa v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Jackson v. LevySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Vose v. U.S. Cities CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pierson v. American National Bank of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Cahill v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Glover v. CornishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Frank and Sharp v. WhitingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Residential Funding Real Estate Holdings, LLC v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.