Moran v. Palmer
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal in ebanoeiy from Wayne Circuit. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Cooley J.:
The original hill was filed to quiet the title of complainant to lot (thirty-seven in section eight, according to the Governor and Judges’ plan of the City of Detroit. The bill alleges that the Governor and Judges conveyed the lot to Barnabas .Campan, December 21, 1833; that the deed thereof was duly recorded in the Register’s dffice of the City of Detroit, December 19; 1834, and again, *369after being duly acknowledged and proved, in the Register’s office of Wayne County, November 29, 1859 ; that by due chain of conveyances,- the title to said lot in fee simple ' became vested in…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Wendell v. Van RensselaerNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
- Buchan v. SumnerNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
- Storrs v. BarkerNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
- Bloomer v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Jackson v. AshtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Jones & Co. v. PeeblesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Smith v. RumseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Trustees in Trust for First Society of Methodist Episcopal Church v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Dunlap v. ByersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Johnson v. HoganMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.