Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Paxton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1885PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from Monroe. (Joslyn, J.) Foreclosure bill. Complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The bill of complaint was filed in this case to foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendants John Paxton and Sarah S. Paxton to secure the payment of a promissory note given by John Paxton to Charles W. Hammond for borrowed money. The note and mortgage bear date the 15th day of April, 1873, and the mortgage was recorded on the 3d day of May, 1873, and covered the undivided one-half of two parcels of land in Monroe county, Michigan: one parcel known as the Jefferson S. Bond farm, containing 49-^ acres lying in the town of Raísinville ; the other, *395known as the “ dock property,” in the city…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murray v. BallouNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
  2. Herrington v. McCollumIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Price v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1851
  4. Watson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1834
  5. Clarkson v. Morgan's deviseesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1846

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ligon v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Meyering v. RussellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Johnson v. HoganMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Pennington v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. RUBY & ASSOCIATES, PC v. Shore Financial ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API