Susan J. Carroll v. Wolpoff & Abramson
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SPROUSE, Circuit Judge:
Susan Carroll appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the law firm of Wolpoff and Abramson on her claim that the firm, acting as collection agents for a creditor, violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 1 specifically, 15 U.S.C. § 1692e(ll). The law firm’s first collection letter to Carroll included the information required by section 1692e(ll), but its follow-up letter did not. The district court, holding that a collection agency’s follow-up notice need not comply with section 1692e(ll), granted summary judgment to the law firm. 2 We…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vadonna M. Pipiles v. Credit Bureau of Lockport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Lenvil Miller v. Payco-General American Credits, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Sherrie Pressley, AKA Sherrie Teague v. Capital Credit & Collection Service, Inc., an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Mowbray v. KozlowskiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
3Cited by23 opinions
- Chaudhry v. GallerizzoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Arsenia Tolentino, and v. Lawrence Friedman, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Farid M. Sayyed v. Wolpoff & AbramsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Karen Wilson v. Draper & Goldberg, P.L.L.C. L. Darren GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Vicki Frey v. Richard J. Gangwish IICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.