Legal Opinion

Susan J. Carroll v. Wolpoff & Abramson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 30, 1992No. 91-2201PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SPROUSE, Circuit Judge:

Susan Carroll appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the law firm of Wolpoff and Abramson on her claim that the firm, acting as collection agents for a creditor, violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 1 specifically, 15 U.S.C. § 1692e(ll). The law firm’s first collection letter to Carroll included the information required by section 1692e(ll), but its follow-up letter did not. The district court, holding that a collection agency’s follow-up notice need not comply with section 1692e(ll), granted summary judgment to the law firm. 2 We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vadonna M. Pipiles v. Credit Bureau of Lockport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. Lenvil Miller v. Payco-General American Credits, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  3. Sherrie Pressley, AKA Sherrie Teague v. Capital Credit & Collection Service, Inc., an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Mowbray v. KozlowskiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Chaudhry v. GallerizzoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  2. Arsenia Tolentino, and v. Lawrence Friedman, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Farid M. Sayyed v. Wolpoff & AbramsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  4. Karen Wilson v. Draper & Goldberg, P.L.L.C. L. Darren GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  5. Vicki Frey v. Richard J. Gangwish IICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API