Legal Opinion

Arsenia Tolentino, and v. Lawrence Friedman, and Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 31, 1995No. 94-1998, 94-2103PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE C. PRATT, Circuit Judge:

FACTS AND BACKGROUND

In this action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692-1692o (“FDCPA”), the parties cross-appeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Judge Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Friedman’s appeal challenges the determination of liability and claims the attorney’s fees awarded to plaintiff were excessive; Tolentino’s cross-appeal claims that the attorney’s fees awarded to her were inadequate.

Friedman is a practicing attorney in Chicago, Illinois; his practice involves debt…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Anthony Graziano v. Michael HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. Student Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. And Friends of the Earth, in 86-5927 v. At & T Bell Laboratories, in 86-5895Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, L.P.A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Peter H. Bombard v. Fort Wayne Newspapers, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Robert E. Bultemeyer v. Fort Wayne Community SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Mace v. Van Ru Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API