Legal Opinion
Caloca v. County of San Diego
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 25, 2002No. D038059PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, Acting P. J.
In a prior appeal in this case we held that under the provisions of the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (Gov. Code, § 3300 et seq.) (Public Safety Officers Bill of Rights), three sheriffs deputies, respondents Victor Caloca, Ronald Cuevas and Rick Símica, were entitled to administrative review of misconduct findings made by the Civilian Law Enforcement Review Board (CLERB). (Caloca v. County of San Diego (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 1209, 1223 [85 Cal.Rptr.2d 660] (Caloca I).) Although the sheriffs department had conducted its own investigation of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Fairfield v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Swars v. Council of City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- San Diego Police Officers Ass'n v. City of San Diego Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- LaGrone v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Morgado v. City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Morrison v. HOUSING AUTH. OF CITY OF LOS ANGELES BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Lopez v. Imperial County Sheriff's OfficeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.